This article first appeared on the blog of the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology. Eastern Europe and Eastern Asia Compared During the last 30 years migration levels have risen sharply. This change is associated with the opening up of national markets by global capital. The affinity between the mobility of capital and the movement of people can be explained through recourse to the Polanyian notion of disembeddedness. The increasing role of foreign investment in the 1990s and the 2000s was associated with privatization, the closing down of local industries, neoliberal (pro-market) shifts in economic poli ..
- Progressive Patriotism
- Post-Pandemic Struggles in Social Reproduction: Lessons from the Therapist Union in Georgia
- The Serbia-Kosovo Treaty: a Servile Acquiescence to US Imperialism
- Is There a Globalization-Migration Nexus?
- Colonial Legacies, Decolonial Struggles: Anthropology and Europe’s Peripheries Today
Google Analytics Statsgenerated by GADWP
The Sutjeska and Bijeljina monuments appear to stand for two profoundly divergent worlds, one symbolizing the cosmopolitan and antifascist past of socialist Yugoslavia, the other embodying the hyper-nationalist and segregationist present of post-Yugoslav states. Yet both monuments were made by the same sculptor. A ..